From Analog to Digital Photography
Regarding the activity of the photo labs,
every year were exposed about 1.2 billion square meters of photographic
paper. The 12% is professional photo labs, the Treaty 42% 46%
in minilab and industrial plants in photofinishing.
Minilabs had opened new perspectives on work and earning. With an
investment of approximately fifty thousand dollars, back in the 90′, you
could buy a piece of equipment that can operate with good effectiveness
in the field of digital photography. For example, you could retouch
photographs or print these out of unusual materials as the custom
shirts. It is possible to affirm that chemical photography, almost
necessarily, were accompanied by the digital according with the demands
of a constantly evolving market that claimed better quality and a
significant reduction in costs.
The versatility of the new media, allowed everyone to overcome those who have represented the limits of analog photography
Limitations that arose from the
difficulties and sometimes the impossibility of carrying out a
negative unsuccessful; by technical problems, physical and chemical tied
to traditional systems such as incorrect exposure, non color control,
upright,
not distortion and “difficulties” in getting the combinations of subjects incompatible.
not distortion and “difficulties” in getting the combinations of subjects incompatible.
Creativity in the design of photographic
images was not necessarily threatened by the advent of new digital
techniques indeed, being able to work digitally, the limit at which
will no longer be possible to intervene on a photograph will be
placed by the same operator. These must be first of all a total mastery
of technique as well as a good knowledge about hardware and software
systems available. This was to reiterate the photographer at who
will determine the quality of the image.
However, the needed to take into strong consideration of being confronted with images peddled for photographs but, that in truth, they are not. Today we find a great number of photographs, in all kinds of printed matter, from newspapers to encyclopedias, from brochures to billboards. Whereas once printed, a very little remains of the original image, in other words, from the impression of photographic film, one can ask whether even the photographs that appear in newspapers, for example, printed with a coarse screening should be considered other than those completely made with digital techniques.
However, the needed to take into strong consideration of being confronted with images peddled for photographs but, that in truth, they are not. Today we find a great number of photographs, in all kinds of printed matter, from newspapers to encyclopedias, from brochures to billboards. Whereas once printed, a very little remains of the original image, in other words, from the impression of photographic film, one can ask whether even the photographs that appear in newspapers, for example, printed with a coarse screening should be considered other than those completely made with digital techniques.
A film could record more accurately an
image than a digital system, but lots of information, such as gradients,
highlights, shadows,
details were systematically reduced at each operation, starting from the negative print on photo paper.
Technically, to get a photo, you must hold a camera, insert the
film, set, if required, some parameter, frame your subject and finally
press the shutter button. At this point if you don’t use an
instant camera , like Polaroid or you do not have a dark room , you must
contact a developing and printing lab to see and use the images. details were systematically reduced at each operation, starting from the negative print on photo paper.
More than a few problem arose when the number of images to manage became hundreds or thousands.
So being able to sort and keep tabs on a large amount of images is a rather difficult task.
So being able to sort and keep tabs on a large amount of images is a rather difficult task.
Comments
Post a Comment